Back Issues
Volume 16, Issue 1: Tohu
Psalms, For Reals
Jared Miller
The revival of psalm-singing in reforming churches today is extremely positive. But especially among the newly reformed
it can raise concerns in the congregation. Evangelicals may have sung "nice" pieces of the Psalms before, but when it comes
to tackling them raw and unbowdlerized, they find themselves wincing. The New Testament tells them without qualification
to sing psalms, and there would be rather few to sing if they cut the ones with imprecatory statements. When they only read
them, one could skim over those difficult parts; but now one has to belt them out loud and clear. Being thus embarrassed of
Scripture obviously has no excuse. The really serious objection is that Scripture is being inconsistentimprecation
versus loving one's enemies. (Incidentally, the issue is not even an Old/New Testament one; Solomon taught love of enemies and returning a
kind word for an angry one.) How could we possibly love someone while at the same time praying for their downfall in language
that some would classify as "hate speech"? We can tackle this by examining the
context, content, and goal of imprecation.
Part of our problem stems from our complacent circumstances which are radically different from those of David
and ancient Israel. Most decent, middle-class evangelicals have never had a personal enemy who (besides lying about
them, oppressing them socially and economically, and unjustly taking them to court) has begun stalking them with a gang of
armed henchmen. Neither have they gone to war against a savage, imperialistic national enemy that was trying to take over
their country and reduce them to slavery. After putting oneself in this position, "Destroy them, Lord, and bring them down," has
a rather more understandable tone.
In addition to that consideration, the context of imprecation is that of the authoritative courtroom and not
personal revenge. A righteous party begs the Judge to deliver justice on an unrighteous party. The plea does not just call for help; it
calls for just helpthe self-proclaimed righteous party submits itself to examination and potential judgment as well if found
guilty (cf. Ps. 7:4_5). Every imprecation is first against oneself and only secondly against another; there is no room for hypocrisy.
The sins that provoke imprecation in the Psalms are nearly always physical violence (Ps. 10:8, 94:5_6, 139:19),
verbal violence with tangible effects (31:13, 35:11, 120:2), or oppression (9:9, 17:9, 72:12). The aggressor is unrepentant
and ignores the appeals of his victims, so they cry to God for justice. Imprecation is reserved to serious situations such as this,
in which unjust damage is being done, and the only court of appeal left is that of prayer.
The content of the imprecation varies. In the gravest instances, it calls for destruction of the enemy (5:10). This is the
last resort against an adversary that will not stop destroying until he himself has been destroyed. In less extreme cases, it calls for
the humbling, shaming, failure, confusion, and "de-fanging" of the adversary (6:10, 35:4). It is very common to request
poetic justicethat wickedness would simply destroy itself (5:10, 9:16, 35:8). In all of this, it is God who does the judging and
not us. Turning the other cheek is consistent with such
prayers.1 Finally, the goals of imprecation are justice and peace. The biblical imprecation cries, from love of the victims,
that destruction be destroyed and oppression be oppressed. Those who find themselves uncomfortable with imprecation
should consider the alternative: standing by, and effectively asking God to stand by, while helpless people who trust in Him are
harmed and left unvindicated. Of course, the best outcome is when the adversary ceases not because he is destroyed, but because
he repents and becomes righteous. While he is successful, he believes he shall never be moved, and continues in his
self-destructive ways. The fall of the wicked leads to their conversion; therefore to pray for their fall is not hate but love. "Fill their faces
with shame; that they may seek thy name, O Lord" (Ps. 83:16). When God judges in this way, His character is
efficaciously revealed (64:9, 83:18).
In this difficult subject, we should be informed by all the Psalms: "Cease from anger" (37:8); "I am for peace"
(120:7); "They rewarded me evil for good. . . . when [my enemies] were sick, my clothing was sackcloth: I humbled my soul
with fasting; and my prayer returned into mine own bosom" (35:12_13). Imprecation and biblical love coexist; why should we
set them at odds? To love one's enemy while calling to God against them is perhaps the most powerful and complete form of
love imaginable.
One of the most practical questions still remains: Why should we sing imprecatory psalms in worship when we have
no specific adversary and thus no occasion for doing so? The primary answer is that the Church at large is always being
persecuted, and so these psalms are offered as prayer on behalf of our suffering brothers and sisters around the world who are subject
to violence and oppression. Another possible answer is that in such cases the psalms are being interpreted in a more complex
way. The Church is the new Israel and Christ the new David; the enemy is that of unbelief, and the battle against it is spiritual.
Our prayer is then that unbelief be brought low and conquered by God's power in the Church, freeing those in its bondage.