Back Issues
Volume 7, Issue 5: Poetics
Such Strange Pleasure
Wes Callihan
Surely indeed it is a good thing to listen to a singer such as this one before
us, who is like the gods in his singing; for I think there is no occasion accomplished
that is more pleasant than when festivity holds sway among all the populace,
and the feasters up and down the houses are sitting in order and listening to
the singer, and beside them the tables are loaded with bread and meats, and from
the mixing bowl the wine steward draws the wine and carries it about and fills
the cups. This seems to my own mind to be the best of occasions.
With these words to the Phaiakian king and his people gathered together in the
great hall, the hero Odysseus begins the tale of his long, strange trip that
makes up books nine through twelve of the Odyssey . His prologue perfectly captures
the ideal setting and the universal attitude toward epic poetry in Homer's day:
at the end of the day, nothing pleases more than to sit and listen to the singer
tell his tale.
And the Odyssey is the best of tales, told by the best of tellers. We may
even have a living picture of Homer in the depiction of the blind Phaiakian bard
Demodokos in book eight. He is a great singer of tales and has the respect of
all the people, and many readers cannot help but feel that Homer has, perhaps
tongue in cheek, placed himself in the poem in the same way that Rembrandt has
placed his own face in some of his paintings. We hope that Demodokos is really
Homer.
The Odyssey is an epic, like the Iliad , but in most other ways the two are
very unlike. The Iliad has the somber subject of a tragedythe Wrath of Achilleusand
a tragedy's somber ending. The Odyssey has the thrilling subject of a romance
(in the old sense)the adventures of Odysseus as he returns to his home country
after the Trojan War and restores order in his kingdom. And it has the happy
ending of comedy (in the old sense).
The Odyssey also differs in its hero. Like Achilleus, Odysseus is great. But
unlike Achilleus, he overcomes obstacles, rather than being overcome. Achilleus
is unable to control his own nature and its results; Odysseus is able to use
his own resourceful nature and manipulate circumstances to his advantage. Achilleus
is driven by fate and finds glory in fighting and dying nobly; Odysseus finds
glory in using his mind and surviving.
The message of the Odyssey is therefore very different from that of the Iliad ,
and even Achilleus supports itOdysseus, visiting Hades, finds there the spirit
of Achilleus, who says he would now rather be a thrall behind a plow in the land
of the living than a king in the land of the dead (How different from Satan in
Paradise Lost , who says it is better to reign in Hell than to serve in Heaven!).
The gods are a minor note in the Odyssey compared to their role in the Iliad ,
because the emphasis is not on the greater forces that drive man, but on his
ability to overcome odds by using his mind. The Odyssey , for all its fantastic
elements, is more to the human scale than the Iliad , the grandeur of which
soars to superhuman heights.
The Odyssey is not set in a distant heroic past, as is the Iliad . Instead,
it seems to be set in the here-and-now, with the exception of the fantastic and
the supernatural, and they are impingements on the modern (to Homer's audience),
not a throwback. It is because of this that there are few, if any, epic similes
in the Odyssey ; they are not needed because the whole setting is familiar,
not remote.
For all these reasons, many people today prefer the Odyssey . It is more like
a modern novel. It relies less on repetition, the stock epithets, the extended
similes, the involvement of deities, and the heroic ethic of war and glory than
does the Iliad, and these elements are difficult for moderns to appreciate.
This is unfortunate, for the Iliad is a glorious poem, and it offers the chance
to enter the mindset of a different culture (something which our chronological
and cultural arrogance makes almost impossible for us). But at least the Odyssey
gets appreciated. And frequently, appreciation for the Odyssey leads to appreciation
of the Iliad.
Historically, critics have given the laurel to the Iliad as the greater poem
because it is a tragedy, and ever since Aristotle tragedy has been considered
the most noble kind of poetry. But the Odyssey's attractions are great. The
poem is full of the spirit of restless adventure, of curiosity about strange
lands and people, of delight in gaining knowledge of the world and using it shrewdly.
There is very little battle in the poem, and the only extended battle scene comes
after a far more extended description of Odysseus's cleverness in reconnoitering
his situation and setting up his enemies for their fall. All of these characteristics
of the Odyssey are indicated in the opening lines of the poem, where Odysseus
is called a "man of many ways" in regard to his intellectual resourcefulness. A
following line, "many were they whose cities he saw, whose minds he learned of,"indicates
Odysseus's curiosity about the world, a mental characteristic shared by none of
the other heroes of either the Iliad or the Odyssey.
As one that for a weary space has lain
Lulled by the song of Circe and her wine
In gardens near the pale of Proserpine,
Where that Aeaean isle forgets the
And only the low lutes of love
And only shadows of wan lovers pine,
As such an one were glad to know the brine
Salt on his lips, and the large air again,
So gladly, from the songs of modern speech
Men turn, and see the stars, and feel the free
Shrill wind beyond the close of heavy flowers
And through the music of the languid hours,
They hear like ocean on a western beach
The surge and thunder of the Odyssey.
Andrew Lang
Back to top
Back to Table of Contents
Copyright © 2012 Credenda/Agenda. All rights reserved.
|